Sunday, August 1, 2010
wk4_Comment on Jordan Culver's post
The experience using Udutu definitely surprised me. I found that I spent my of my time learning how to use the interface and not so concerned about the organization of the project. After many hours of learning how to upload different forms of media, I found that the presentation of my lesson was less than optimal. I was impressed with myself for be able to use the application to create online learning modules, but I don’t think is any more effective. It does provide a means for students to access and practice music at home, but I find that the lack of a personal guide will made it less engaging.
wk4_Comment on Carolyn Chew's post
wk4_Comment on Quinn Brown
wk4_Udutu_Project
The tutorials and forums were great. They really answered many of my questions and quickly. It is nice to see that others are out there using this great tool and even having the same issues as I am. Please, feel free to check out my UDUTU project by clicking on the link below.
Click HERE to view the Parts_of_Speech UDUTU project.
If you already have UDUTUteach and UDUTULearn installed on facebook and would like to view the project using Facebook click HERE.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Wimba-week3
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Wk3_ comment on Billy Goins' blog
A semi-formal study released in 2008 showed Chicago area schools in the first year of using Study Island had greater improvement in meeting or exceeding standards on the Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) over fifth- and eighth-grade students within the state not using study Island (Magnolia Consulting, 2008). This particular study became a key endorsement for the sale and integration of Study Island within Illinois school districts, including my own. Should a single study, which when read thoroughly admits that other factors may have contributed to the outcome, be the sole foundation for selecting and implementing an LMS?
Wk3_comment on Liz Applegate's blog
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Wk3_Content Tools_What are they?
Learning transactions are extremely important in education. Exposing the student to new information and seeing how he or she stores and uses the new information is key for the educator to assess if the student has master what has been presented. The teacher tells, shows, and asks the student in regards to the information presented. The student’s only job is to respond. This seems as though the teacher is doing all of the work and not allowing the student adequate practice with the information or terminology. Laurillard’s “Conversational framework” has the teacher and the student sharing equally the responsibilities of learning. Both are to reflect, interact, and discuss equally the new information. This model is not ideal for e-learning. For e-learning the classes should be tailored to the student and the student should be given the information and then a chance to process and respond to the information such as in the learning transaction model (Gilbert, & Gale, 2008).
A great thing about an e-learning tool such as Moodle is that the teacher is still able to assess a student’s progress and/or learning. Moodle Outcomes are much like a rubric. It looks at the student’s work and assigns an outcome statement to the student’s work. The educator is able to set up the Outcomes or Goals for the e-learning experience in order to assess the student as one would in a traditional classroom (Moodle, 2008).
References:
Development: Outcomes. (2008). Retrieved July 14, 2010 from
http://docs.moodle.org/en/Development:Outcomes
Gilbert, L., & Gale, V. (2008). Principles of e-learning systems engineering. Oxford:
Chandos Publishing.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
week 2 comment on Joe Hubber's blog
MONDAY, JULY 5, 2010
The primary purpose of Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) is to harness the power of technology to deliver and distribute education and training (ADL vision). ADL is responsible for the creation and development of the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) initiative, which would allow for Learning Management Systems (LMS) to be used interchangeably without proprietary constraints. The main function of SCORM content is that it has the ability to be used within a variety of systems in order to recognize students and relay their success and mastery of a certain subject or topic (Basic SCORM concepts, 2008). Provided that the LMS is SCORM conformant, the SCORM is interchangeable across a variety of platforms, which leads to the reusability of the original content.
In 2006, ADL partnered with Florida Virtual Schools (FLVS) to create a virtual school program and develop an innovative curriculum that would allow students to use technology to meet their ever-changing educational needs (Pozo-Olono, 2006). The SCORM approach was utilized in order to integrate additional technology into the present courses. This new content took the shape of virtual microscope labs, simulation games, blogging, podcasting, and mobile technology applications. Using the SCORM open model, FLVS was able to adapt content from multiple sources to create a comprehensive program with e-learning capabilities that are able to take full advantage of the reusability quality of SCORM content.
As Pozo-Olono (2006) reported, FLVS is looking to work with ADL to develop a 3-year plan to enable teachers to track student progress and customize lessons based on individual progress more effectively. Using the SCORM approach, students will be able to access and search for topics and/or lessons with greater success and ease.
One FLVS student (A. Aggarwal, personal communication, July 13, 2010), states that the ease of use with FLVS is present. In addition to homework assignments, the platform offers interactive games, which aid with lesson comprehension. For those concerned about the lack of contact with instructors, FLVS has incorporated this aspect in. Aggarwal states that the instructor contacts the student and the parent a minimum of once a week to discuss progress. Both students and parents have access to the online platforms.
FLVS educator Mike Findley (2000) allays the fears of those concerned with the use of virtual classrooms in regards to the social aspect and usability of virtual platforms. Thanks to the use of the SCORM initiative, FLVS has branched out to create Florida Virtual School Global Services. This program provides highly qualified instructors throughout the United States the opportunity to teach courses in the program. With this addition, FLVS is now able to offer expanded curriculum choices as well as extra-curricular club activities.
week 2 comment on Kathy Kellen
You Have to Look at the Big Picture!
Taking a closer look at the specific costs and procedures for launching VLEs gives a sense of greater appreciation for FSO, Dr. Holly Ludgate‘s vision, and everyone who has had a hand in its development! The significant person-power hours in the multi-faceted process of launching even a single course are staggering, let alone the long on-call hours for support specialists.
Kevin Kruse’s article “Measuring the Total Cost of e-Learning” (2002-2004) engages the reader in a fictitious company’s comparison of costs for Instructor Led Training vs. Asynchronous e-Learning. Factors to review include: gathering assumptions and baseline data on the life span of the course, the total number of students, student learning time in the classroom, reduction in seat time, and burdened compensation for both the instructor and the student being trained; determining the design and development costs; determining the delivery costs; the administrative and maintenance costs. All of these then result in the total cost comparison. It is strikingly evident that decisions should not be made until the final step when the whole picture is clear.
Companies who build their own LMS focus on the key functionalities that are the prioritized, most critical needs of their organization.
Hierarchies and the operational rights at each level must also be considered. According to David Boggs in his article “Learning Management System (lms) Hierarchies” from Articlesbase (2005-2010),
Remember that learning management systems
hierarchy is a way of organizing and managing the
training of your people. It requires some thought.
The business rules that you establish for your LMS
hierarchy must mirror your organization’s framework
and your e-Learning goals and objectives.
A quick Google search points to EasyCourseCreator.com where the initial cost is clearly spelled out. With a set up fee of $2000 and an annual service cost of $9950, Easy Course Creator gives access to LCMS, LMS, and CMS creation.
It is obviously a much bigger business than the general public would have any idea of.
Sources:
Boggs, D. (2005-2010). Learning management system (lms) hierarchies. Articlesbase. Retrieved on July10, 2010 from
http://www.articlesbase.com/e-learning-articles/learning-management-system-lms-hierarchies-476435.html
Kruse, K. (2002-2004). Measuring the total cost of e-learning. E-LearningGuru.com. Retrieved on July 10, 2010 from http://online.fullsail.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=assignment.main&itemId=194014
http://www.easycoursecreator.com/web/index.php?siteid=145&pageid=350 Retrieved on July 10, 2010
Monday, July 12, 2010
UDUTU
2. Lesson Title: Verbs
In this lesson students will learn how to identify action and linking verbs in a sentence.
3. The lesson will be correlated with my Action Research project which is using technology as an extra resources for Adult Basic Education (ABE). In the ABE course the adult students grade equivalency is third grade to an early ninth grade. For many of my adult students, we will need to start very basic and work up. Many of them have not been to school in several years and have forgotten what verbs and subjects are.
4. This lesson will go with my action research project
5. I will be using a mixture of self-directed and blank scenarios. It will be important to use the blank scenarios so the students will be able to see the correlation between the set up in the classroom books and the Udutu site’s examples.
6. http://web.me.com/katepfinn/Site_5/Introduction.html here is my AR website. The introduction explains a bit more about my project.
wk2_LCMS Systems_What are they?
There are a few differences between LCMS and CMS or LMSs. LCMS seems to be a precise combination of both CMSs and LMSs. CMS allows there to be content creation and storage of data. LMS allows the learner to have certain administration capabilities. These are the two application ideas that LCMS has used from both CMS and LMS. Unlike LMS, LCMS gives the learner application of content (LCMS roundup, 2001).
LCMSs seem to be more time efficient and more business savvy. Since the learner has to take a pre-assessment that will tell the administrator what content areas the learner needs more training in, it is saving the company much time. It is not only saving the company time and money for not having to pay for a standard training that the learner may already know 80% of content, but it is also getting that employee trained more quickly and getting said employee to work faster earning the company money.
References:
LCMS roundup.(2001). Retrieved July 13, 2010 from Learning
Circuits http://web.archive.org/web/20071012195821/http://www.learningcircuits.org/2001/aug2001/ttools.htm
McGee,P., Carmean, C., & Jafari, A. (2002). Course management systems for learning: byeond accidental pedagogy. Retrieved July
13, 2010 from http://books.google.com/books?id=VG2aF54Zef8C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA209#v=onepage&q&f=false
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Week 1 Wimba 1
WEEK 1 LMO OVERVIEW
The alphabet soup of online learning systems seem to all be intertwined. Course Managing Systems focus more on allowing the student to become an active learner and an active participant in the planning of the learning. Creating a way for a student to become more emotionally connected to his or her studies. (Community College Week, 2010) When choosing the best Classroom Management System for a class or school one must consider if the school has enough funding and if the Classroom Management System will work for all the students involved. (Community College Week, 2010)
Moodle is being used as a Classroom Management System as well as a Learning Management System. Moodle in the classroom is known for giving students a platform to show what has been learned and ways of showing what has been learned. Moodle has crossed over and is now showing up in the corporate world of Learning Management Systems. (MarketWatche, 2010) As corporations work on expanding the company that means there are more demands for employees. With these demands comes more training. Companies have started implementing applications and educational type software to help train the employees and giving them that platform to expand on what has been learned.
As stated before the alphabet soup of online learning systems seem to be intertwined. As educators are using these management systems in classrooms so are corporations using on the employees. We as humans are ever evolving and learning it only makes sense that all learning resources would some how tie into each other.
References
(2010). Out of Office and into Moodle. MarketWatch: Global Round-up, 9(5), 213-
214. Retrieved from Business Source Premier database.
(2010). The Right CMS Can Engage Students, Promote Retention. Community College
Week, 22(16), 4. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
week 1 Abbie Toy
No wonder I'm struggling with academic writing - in the article "Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions , Know-How, and Academic Identity, the authors outline some of the challenges of writing as being self-doubt, creating ideas, doubt of relevance, lack of skills, and fear of critique (Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J., 2009)! That is only a few of the examples of why it is hard for people to start writing! I know that I struggle with most of these challenges. These authors also note that "developing an identity and voice as an academic writer results from the process of coming to terms with writing emotions and developing procedural and technical writing know-how."
Often students are thrown into academic situations where they have to write scholarly papers, and are never formerly taught the proper format. More focus needs to be placed on instruction of academic writing and research. One group of people are developing an idea that could change the way academic writing is taught - it is called writing consultations (Murray, R., Thow, M., Moore, S., & Murphy, M., 2008). A writing consultation takes place between two academic writers placed together to help improve writing practices. The partners will take turns being the writer or the consultant. The consultant leads the writer through six steps while filling out a template to keep notes. After filling out the template, they switch places and work on the other person's writing. The process is meant to change writing behavior. I think this is a wonderful idea, because it is always easier to bounce ideas off of someone else and share different expertise. I hope that more online learning environments think about using this process when students are presented with big academic writing assignments. I would not have felt so overwhelmed and alone during the writing process if I could have been paired up with another classmate to do a writing consultation!
week 1 Joe Hubber's post
One of the more astounding and surprising aspects of course management systems (CMS) is that most anyone who is associated with them, or have used them, are not about to answer whether or not they work at keeping students engaged, or if they are an accurate measure of mastery (Carmean & Brown, 2005). Faculty members embrace them for use in their classes because higher education students embrace the new modes of learning, so little effort is extended to determine their success.
According to Carmean and Brown (2005), the individuals that claim that CMS is a success are doing so based on the notion that any of inclusion of technology is beneficial, but more often than not “[w]hat is missing is assessment “(p. 3). McGee, Carmean, and Jafari (2005) posit that students and faculty alike began to use the CMS with the unexpected result of it becoming a learning management tool. This led to some difficulty with the functionality of the CMS, which in turn caused some frustration. Those individuals that were closely involved, and consequently directly impacted by this frustration began to voice the changes that they wished to see occur in CMS. McGee, Carmean, and Jafari documented their desires. Participants wished to see the CMS become more social, involving more feedback and interaction, they wished them to become more engaging to accommodate all learner preferences, and students had to be able to take some ownership of their learning. In investigating these aspects, it became apparent that the end users must become directly involved in the design process.
This raised other issues, and as McGee, Carmean, and Jafari mentioned, administration must find a way to balance the economic realities of the situation. As Walker (2010), points out, the Great Recession has left its impact on schools who will now be hard pressed to stay within budget. School systems now faced with diminishing budgets must look at ways to implement CMS in an open-source environment, taking advantage of applications that they can use for free. Sources such as Moodle are becoming the norm in areas where schools were not able to afford Blackboard. Open source systems such as Moodle and Google apps make it easier for both the students and the teachers to access what would otherwise be expensive and unaffordable programs.
What all the experts agree upon is that the development of the CMS is an evolutionary process that does not remain static. If the CMS is to continue to succeed, it will require the input of all involved in its use.
Sources
Carmean, C., & Brown, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Assessing course management systems. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
McGee, P., Carmean, C., & Jafari, A. (Eds.). (2005). Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy. Hershey, PA:Information Science Publishing.
Waters, J. (2010). Prepare for impact. T H E Journal, 37(5), 20-25. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Week 1 Reading_History of VLEs
When posed with the question, “When did distance learning start?” one must first define educate. To educate is defined as “to develop the knowledge, skill or character of…” (Webster, 2010) by the Webster’s Dictionary. A simpler definition is “to provide information with” (Webster, 2010).
Many times one man’s idea can change the course of how people do things or view things. For example, E.M. Forster is believed to be ahead of his time with his short story “The Machine Stops” he wrote in 1928. In this story Forster creates a world that is divided into two. The way the citizens communicate is through a contraption that acts much like an audio/visual contraption. Using this tool the citizens are able to share ideas and knowledge (Wikipedia, 2010).
Today, nearly 82 years later, students are able to study abroad without moving to another country. With the use of computers, internet, email, and applications such as Skype, Wimba, and BlackBoard students are able to communicate with each other as well as the professor on a daily basis. Distance learning can be defined as “learning that uses television, audio/video tapes, computers, internet, etc;, instead of physical attendance at classes in a centralized facility” (BuisnessDictionary, 2010).
One may not be able to produce an exact date of when distance learning began, however, by looking back in history and look at some great men and womens ideas, one can be sure distance learning was sparked from these ideas.
References:
education. (2010). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved July 3, 2010,
from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/education
distance learning. (2010). In Businessdictionary oneline. Retrieved July 3, 2010,
from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/distance-learning.html
The machine stops. (2010). Wikipedia.org. Retrieved July 3, 2010, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops